buy silver

Are the American People a Crop of Human Slaves? Part One

The Intel Hub

This will be an exclusive series intended to inform the people on how the global crime syndicate, commonly referred to as the Illuminati or the New World Order, have manipulated the masses into becoming nothing less than slaves of the corporations and elite who cause the problems in the first place. This research series will be archived in our Intel Soldiers section.

Chapter 1 – Are The American People A Crop Of Human Slaves?

By Lipper

Unfortunately the answer is yes, but I will let you be the judge.

With the help of many “good and true Patriots,” I intend to lay out just what exactly has happened to “We the People” of the United States. A man’s life is measured by what he accomplishes whether it be for good or for evil.  I will also be doing a YouTube series on the following information so be sure to follow my channel as well.

The information we have been provided would literally fill a library. I will do my best to get the “meat” of the information laid out, and provide links and sources for further study. Should I not be able to finish this series for some unknown reason; another will take up where I have left off and so on until it is all laid bare.

I feel it is only fitting to start at our birth, due to the fact that the day we are born we become slaves to this global menace. We will also touch on marriage certificates, but first lets start with a little background.

What exactly is a birth certificate?

FORT FAIRFIELD JOURNAL

Structure of the Birth Certificate

by David Deschesne

Did the State Pledge Your Body to a Bank?

Right: Some birth and marriage certificates are now “warehouse receipts,” printed on banknote paper, which may mark you and yours as ‘chattel’ property of the banks that our government borrows from every day.

A certificate is a “paper establishing an ownership claim.” – Barron’s Dictionary of Banking Terms.  Registration of births began in 1915, by the Bureau of Census, with all states adopting the practice by 1933.

Birth and marriage certificates are a form of securities called “warehouse receipts.”  The items included on a warehouse receipt, as descried at §7-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, the law which governs commercial paper and transactions, which parallel a birth or marriage certificate are:

  • -the location of the warehouse where the goods are stored…(residence)
  • -the date of issue of the receipt…..(“Date issued”)
  • -the consecutive number of the receipt…(found on back or front of the certificate, usually in red numbers)
  • -a description of the goods or of the packages containing them…(name, sex, date of birth, etc.)
  • -the signature of the warehouseman, which may be made by his authorized agent…(municipal clerk or state registrar’s signature)

Birth/marriage certificates now appear to at least qualify as “warehouse receipts” under the Uniform Commercial Code.  Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th ed. defines:

Warehouse receipt. “…A warehouse receipt, which is considered a document of title, may be a negotiable instrument and is often used for financing with inventory as security.”

Since the U.S. went bankrupt in 1933, all new money has to be borrowed into existence.  All states started issuing serial-numbered, certificated “warehouse receipts” for births and marriages in order to pledge us as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve’s banks.  The “Full faith and Credit” of the American people is said to be that which back the nation’s debt.  That simply means the American people’s ability to labor and pay back that debt.  In order to catalog its laborers, the government needed an efficient, methodical system of tracking its property to that end.  Humans today are looked upon merely as resources – “human resources,” that is.

Governmental assignment of a dollar value to the heads of citizens began on July 14, 1862 when President Lincoln offered 6 percent interest bearing-bonds to states who freed their slaves on a “per head” basis.  This practice of valuating humans (cattle?) continues today with our current system of debt-based currency reliant upon a steady stream of fresh new chattels to back it.

Additional Birth Certificate Research:

Federal Children

Joyce Rosenwald

In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth “registration” or what we now know as the “birth certificate.” It was known as the “Maternity Act” and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for “other purposes.” One of those other purposes provided for the establishment of a federal bureau designed to cooperate with state agencies in the overseeing of its operations and expenditures. What it really did was create a federal birth registry which exists today, creating “federal children.” This government, under the doctrine of “Parens Patriae,” now legislates for American children as if they are owned by the federal government. Through the public school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into the process of asking for “permission” from Daddy government to do all those things necessary to carry out daily activities that exist in what is called a “free country.”

Photobucket

Before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered into family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as “official” records. Since 1921 the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child’s birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the united States , thereby making him/her a United States Citizen. For the past several years a social security number has been mandated by the federal government to be issued at birth.

In 1933, bankruptcy was declared by President Roosevelt. The governors of the then 48 States pledged the “full faith and credit” of their states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve system. To wit:”Full faith and credit” clause of Const. U.S. article 4. sec. 1, requires that foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of it’s origin. That foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state. And that a judgment or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken.

Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. cites omitted.

The state claims an interest in every child within it’s jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the assets of the trust to be tracked. If this information is true, your child is now owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of the bankrupt united states. We are now designated by this government as “HUMAN RESOURCES,” with a new crop born every year.”


Joyce later went on to say:

The Maternity Act was eventually repealed, but parts of it have been found in other legislative acts. What this act attempted to do was set up government by appointment, run by bureaucrats with re-delegated authority to tax, which is in itself unconstitutional. What was once declared as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of this nation in the past should be upheld in a court challenge today. The constitution hasn’t changed. What has changed is the way this government views human life. Today we are defined as human resources, believed to be owned by government. The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked. Government mandated or legislated National I.D. is unconstitutional anyway you look at it. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the several states does not exist and could never survive a court challenge as shown above. Writing letters to elected public servants won’t save us when we all know their agenda does not include serving those who placed them in power. Perhaps the 10th amendment of the federal constitution guaranteeing states rights will, if challenged, when making it known that we as individuals of the several states will not be treated as chattel of the U.S. government. If the federal government believes they own us, and as such have the right to demand national I.D. cards, and health I.D. cards, which will in truth tag us as we tag our animals, then let them bring forth the documents to prove their authority to legislate for it. If our G-D given rights to liberty and freedom, which were the foundation upon which this nation was created do not exist, and liberty and freedom is only an illusion under which the American people suffer, then let the governments of this nation come forward and tell the people. But…if we are indeed free, then we should not have to plead or beg before our elected public servants to be treated as such. If, in truth we are not free, then perhaps it’s time to let the final chapter of the Great American Revolution be written……….

Security:

What Does Security mean?

An instrument representing ownership(stocks), a debt agreement(bonds), or the right of ownership(derivatives).

Investopedia Explains Security:

A security is essentially a contract that can be assigned a value and traded.

Section 8—102. Definitions

(15) “Security”, except as otherwise provided in Section 8–103  means an obligation of an issuer or a share, participation, or other interest in an issuer or in proerty or an enterprise of an issuer.

Section 8–102. Definitions. (15) “Security”, except as otherwise provided in  Section  8–103, means  an  obligation of an issuer or a share, participation or  other  interest  in  an  issuer  or  in  property  or  a enterprise of an issuer:

(i) which  is  represented  by  a  security  certificate bearer or registered form, or the transfer of which may be registered upon books maintained for that purpose by or on behalf of the issuer;

(ii) which is one of a class or series or by  its  terms  is divisible  into a class  or series of shares, participations, interests, or obligations;

(iii) which:

  • (A) is, or  is  of  a  type,  dealt  in  or  traded  on securities exchanges or securities markets; or
  • (B) is  a  medium  for  investment  and  by  its  terms expressly provides that it is a  security  governed by this Article.

We will get into the definitions of Issue, New Issue, and Issuer as we continue this very important research series.

Stay tuned for Chapter two as we attempt to unmask the global elites plan of control through manipulation.




Join to Receive Exclusive Intel Hub News Alerts and Podcasts


Print Friendly

Comments

2 Responses to “Are the American People a Crop of Human Slaves? Part One”
  1. John Taurus says:

    How do you keep slaves happy? You never, ever let your slaves realize that they are slaves! Remind your slaves often that they are “FREE”. Give them a vote in a farce called an “ELECTION” and let them pick which puppet will issue the Masters orders and pretend that it is being done for the “Children”, the “Old Folks” or the “General Good”. Meanwhile, the Masters siphon off our wealth in the form of taxes The Masters have us fighting their wars and paying for the war, too! What suckers.

  2. Jeffrey says:

    Very interesting research you have done here. I happen to be aware of all these facts. What I am now focused on is how to free the living principal being (me) not the all CAPS name that the government wants in my ignorance to be a surety for. The all caps name is not who I am. So this is why all these foreign jurisdiction Governments always ask who are you? If i agree that I am the all caps name they know that I have forgot who I am. Lets face it I am not my name. I say when asked the question “who are you?” by any government agent or agency I am as I am and they call me Jeff. If one does not make it clear that you know who you are it will be presumed that you are incompetent and they will take matters into there own hands for that very reason. On the other hand if when the judge calls your all caps name in the court and you stand and say something to the effect of “Im here for the matter of JEFF LAST NAME(the name of a trust in which the living you is acting as trustee) here to settle any claims or charges outstanding in the matter” The judge will become agitated because you are not cooperating, and begin to threaten you with contempt or something similar. I find it very interesting that they need you to say “I am JEFF LAST NAME” and state your name for the record to proceed. If one does not do that, their hands are tied as to what to do with you. Next comes a competency hearing to ascertain if you are incompetent to stand trial. If it is found that you are incompetent a licensed attorney will be appointed for you on your behalf and now they can proceed cause the attorney will take care of the matter for you based on your incompetence.
    Now the actual constructive trust is formed when they send you Social security card with the the all caps name on it and fully disclose to you what it is by informing you that the card itself(has value) and all the information on the card including the numbers belongs to them and you will have to return upon demand, and they tell you to keep it in a safe place. Upon your execution of all the above mentioned details makes you the trustee of a trust created in your name but the Foreign Government (what I call Corp US) is the creator and the beneficiary for the trust and you are merely the trustee. Here is another interesting concept behind this If you are truly the trustee, and I assure you that you are. Is not the trustee immune from prosecution? AKA Corporate immunity when the trustee acts on behalf of the trust it is the actual trust that acts and not the trustee. Also if it is the Foreign agent that created the trust and put your name on it, when ever there is a charge or the trust takes on a public liability. Such is the case when you see The State Of Colorado v. your all caps name. Seems to me there would be a conflict of interested as they are going after there own creation, so technically the trustee could ask that the charges to be dismissed for Failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, because they are suing an entity they created how can there be a remedy and for who? Any way just a few thoughts on the topic. when will part two come out?

Thank you for your continued support!

Join Our Exclusive Mailing List
Email:
For Email Marketing you can trust

 

Print Friendly