Is A False Flag Nuke On The Table?
Before Its News
Zen Gardner
March 31st, 2011
The “mini-nuke terror threat on America” war drums are pounding louder by the day.
Last year it was Obama and other stooge politicians warning us, then Homeland Insecurity, and now it’s threat letters in Chicago. (Remember the false flag anthrax letters?)
Obama was particularly clear almost exactly one year ago:
“The single biggest threat to U.S. security, both short-term, medium-term and long-term, would be the possibility of a terrorist organization obtaining a nuclear weapon. This is something that could change the security landscape in this country and around the world for years to come.
If there was ever a detonation in New York City, or London, or Johannesburg, the ramifications economically, politically and from a security perspective would be devastating.
We know that organizations like al-Qaida are in the process of trying to secure nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction, and would have no compunction at using them.” Source
Spoken like a true insider. He knows very well who the real perpetrators would be in such a horrendous event. He’s putting the word out there to strike international fear, and introduce the possibility into the public consciousness, and tell you in advance who the perpetrators will be. He’s also putting national leaders on notice.
And now this latest spate of so-called terrorist nuke warnings in Chicago.
It’s starting to feel like not if, but when…and where.
We certainly know the “why”.
Problem. Reaction. Solution.
Follow @IntelHub













Is that billboard for real? And why is Bush giving the “Hail Hitler” salute in it?