Argentina: Inventor Designs Perpetual Magnetic Motor
The Intel Hub
Shepard Ambellas
January 2, 2012
There have been many perpetual devices designed over the years, some intercepted by big corporations, others under-funded as they slip through the cracks and never make it to the market.
It is hard to patent a perpetual device as governments of the world want this technology for themselves.
People have been killed over this type stuff.
Interestingly, Wikipedia goes along with the corporate lie to say essentially that perpetual motion is nonsense and can’t be achieved.
An excerpt from Wikipedia reads like a script from the elite themselves;
Perpetual motion describes hypothetical machines that operate or produce useful work indefinitely and, more generally, hypothetical machines that produce more work or energy than they consume, whether they might operate indefinitely or not.
There is undisputed scientific consensus that perpetual motion in a closed system would violate the first law of thermodynamics and/or the second law of thermodynamics. Machines which extract energy from seemingly perpetual sources—such as ocean currents—are indeed capable of moving “perpetually” (for as long as that energy source itself endures), but they are not considered to be perpetual motion machines because they are consuming energy from an external source and are not closed systems. Similarly, machines which comply with both laws of thermodynamics but access energy from obscure sources are sometimes referred to as perpetual motion machines, although they also do not meet the standard criteria for the name.
Despite the fact that successful closed system perpetual motion devices are physically impossible in terms of our current understanding of the laws of physics, the pursuit of perpetual motion remains popular.
Now an innovator out of Argentina has designed a perpetual magnetic motor that actually works.
There are other devices like this perpetual magnetic generator that exist such as the over-unity motor, which inventors have been toying with for awhile.
Even more primitive forms have been achieved such as a magnetic generator made by an Ottawa man.
An excerpt from PHYSORG reads;
That’s why 46-year-old Heins, a college drop-out from Ottawa who’s been working on his project since 1985, is being very cautious. He is the first to admit that he doesn’t know how his machine works from a physics standpoint. He just hopes that someone else might understand.
Last week, Heins demonstrated his machine to MIT professor Markus Zahn, an expert in electromagnetic and electronic systems. It proved interesting enough to stump the professor, as well. But Zahn thinks the idea is worth investigating further. “It’s an unusual phenomena I wouldn’t have predicted in advance,” Zahn told The Toronto Star. “But I saw it. It’s real.”
In Heins’ machine, he explains that magnetic friction somehow gets turned into a magnetic boost. Working with an electric motor, he attached the drive shaft to a steel rotor with small round magnets lining its outer edges. In this set-up of a simple generator, the rotor would spin so that the magnets passed by a wire coil just in front of them, generating electrical energy.
Larger perpetual generators will be in demand in the future for use as a clean energy source to power cars, homes and more.
The following is a larger scaled up model that can turn an alternator, producing power.
Follow @IntelHub
As bad as wikipedia is with their political correctness and anti-truth misinformation, I’m going to have to take their side in this case, simply by reading the included wikipedia excerpt. The writer does not understand that these are not scientific theories, they are scientific laws. Energy never magically appears. Nowhere in the wikipedia excerpt does it say or imply that “perpetual motion is nonsense and can’t be achieved.” It does say that under our current understanding of the laws of physics, closed system perpetual motion is impossible.
Heins’ machine is exciting and apparently works. However, it is not magically creating energy, it only appears that way because we do not yet understand how it works. Whenever Dr. Zahn, or whoever, figures out how it actually works, it will adhere to our scientific laws, most likely from interactions in the quantum mechanics scale. That knowledge would be tremendously revolutionary, but it will be silenced by the government and energy companies, just like they have always done.
Robert,
I think the project here would more accurately be called an energy transformer. It uses a small input voltage to get it started, to vastly amplify the output. If I recall, there’s a company in Australia that uses this principle to make a unit that produces 1500 KW from an input about 1/40th of that. If you gang 4 or 5 of them, you can produce enough power to run your home. You’d think, that if power companies were REALLY and truly concerned about the environment (as they SAY they are), and recognize that in some areas, building another power plant needed to supply the growing demand isn’t feasible, they would embrace this technology and bring it to market. But, that’s not how the old paradigm works. Having said that, I should also note that there’s going to be a lot of changes coming for the old paradigm, and it may not survive it. Which would be a good thing.
I thought one of these up when I was ten. I asked in order, my physics teacher (HS), Engineering Prof. (FIT), and a retired scientist who worked on the Manhatten Project. Despite being years and thousands of miles apart, they all had exactly the same answer. “Well yes, but eventually it would get to a speed where everything would line up and it couldn’t go further” WHAT??!!??
These are NOT perpetual motion machines, they merely get their energy from a storage device, in this case a magnet. Think of five cylinders, each two inches long and a half inch in diameter. The first is a wooden dowel, the second a milled lump of coal, the third a C cell battery, the fourth a spent uranium fuel rod, and the last a magnet. Each one of these stores energy in a different way, chemically or atomic. A magnet will eventually wear down and demagnetize, just like an old battery. But instead of days, it takes years. It is the act of harnessing the magnetic flux in a useful way that’s the key.