Re-Post: 9/11 Cover up: Standard Controlled Demolition or Possible Micro Nukes?
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
The Intel Hub
By Shepard Ambellas
On 9/11 there is no doubt that multiple bombs were detonated in the WTC complex. This fact can not be disputed and is clearly documented by hundreds of videos and backed up by many eye witness testimonies.
Micro nukes or suitcase nukes have been around since the 1950′s. Multiple tests have been conducted with micro nukes by our government within the United States. As a result, fully detailed plans to demo large buildings have been drawn up.
An excerpt from Military.com reads… “Suitcase nukes, or atomic demolition devices (ADMs), are actually small nuclear bombs. Both the Soviets and the US had such devices during the “Cold War.” They were to be carried by Special Operations Forces who would be parachuted ahead/behind main force units using the ADMs to destroy large bridges, collapse mountain passes, or destroy entire major headquarters.
These ADMs can be no larger than a king size suitcase. Some were designed for a large backpack. They were considered tactical nukes, and authority for usage could have been released to the Soviet “Front” commander or the US Theater Commander-in-Chief.”
A man by the name of Dr. Ed Ward has documented the use of micro-nukes on the World Trade Center complex attack that took place in September of 2001.
One of the smoking guns in this case is that over 5.3 billion pounds of steel was instantly turned into 2 billion pounds of dust. Massive steel beams were also bent like pretzels.
There were many events that took place on and around 9/11 that were out of place or unusual including a massive hurricane off the coast of New York.
The startling fact that most of the WTC buildings were pulverized into a fine dust, 20 microns in size or less, cannot be ignored. This is a tell tale sign of a high energy release typical of a nuclear explosion. Eyewitness accounts and personal testimony indicate that people were thrown an entire city block from what was described as a warm wind just as the towers begin to collapse.
There were also multiple reports of “hanging skin” or “melted skin” on victims around ground zero. This was a common occurrence in the Hiroshima blast.
Major hot spots were reported in and around the debris for up to six months after 9/11. This is commonly referred to as “China Syndrome”, where nuclear material will continue to undergo fission for a period of time, generating massive heat plumes.
In most of the recently released videos of the WTC controlled demolition (via the Freedom of Information ACT) there were sections edited out of the video and audio clips. In most of the videos, the initial collapse of the towers explosive sounds were removed. One video shows the penthouse on building 7 being demolished on the roof just before the building comes down.
But perhaps the most startling revelation is the fact that vehicles looked incinerated up to one mile away from the towers. Cars were even flipped over as if they came out of a war zone. This could signify a micro nuke blast.
High energy releases have a distinct look. Evidence shows that levels of Tritium were 55 times higher than normal in the WTC debris. Tritium is a by product of a nuclear blast.
Remember that on the morning after 9/11 authorities had already removed 70 dump truck loads of debris from the crime scene.
The fact that many of the first responders are now dead if not very sick does not sound like the bi-product of a falling building, but more like a massive dose of radiation. Most of the responders have died of blood cancer, yet another sign of radiation exposure.
Massive craters can be seen from aerial photographs that show tremendous voids under the towers. There were reports of explosions in subways under the WTC before the collapse as well as tunnels filled with smoke.
Molten metal was seen in and around the debris of the WTC for months. There is also the fact that the debris field was substantially low for the magnitude of buildings that were destroyed; thus signifying that most of the debris was incinerated upon the demo blast.
According to Richard Gage of AE911Truth.org, little square chips of nano-thermite were found in the WTC debris. It is possible that nano-thermite was used in conjunction with micro nukes to incinerate most of the debris in an attempt to avoid damaging other buildings in the area.
Another important fact is that tiny metallic spheres 20 – 30 microns in size were also found throughout the debris according to an interview of Richard Gage conducted by Shepard Ambellas of the Intel Hub Radio Show on September 1, 2010. This signifies that lots of metal throughout the complex was actually in the molten stage and cooled while airborne.
There is also the fact that the WTC complex has been reportedly sprayed down with water everyday after 9/11 for years.
Editors Note: If anybody can produce the actual seismic data from 9/11/2001 in and around NYC please send it to tips@theintelhub.com for evaluation.
High Yield Energy Release
Dimitri Khalezov 911 video
Seismic Data from 9/11
Declassified Micro-nuke Test














Micro nukes are the only thing that can explain the molten steel (for months), pulvarized building, tritium levels present, etc. See 26 part presentation from Dimitri Khalezov for more… (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_UsC6GvKf0&p=0851B8EB84E7EDDF&playnext=1&index=1)
OK Guys, chill out – reaching for the stars here. Micro nukes or portable suitcase bombs were the equivalent of nucelar shells fired from artillary in a portable pkg. COuld you imagine a friggen mushroom cloud over the site? Are you guys all smoking something here or what? You are all sounding like a buch of cooky hilbillies who have no reference to true science and math but have a ton of opinions with little ture science other than being sensational. There are plenty or reports that stated the WTC’s fell by design, not by explosives. Did it ever occur to anyone that the original plans to build the towers took that inot consideration? Dugh…………helloooo – we were putting men on the moon long before we built the WTC so why is it so hard for all these brilliant conmpsiracy theorists to realize that the worst possible thing in the world to do would be scatter a mushrrom could of debirs over Manahtten in a “carefully planned response” as you all believe. Come on folks – get real here and step up to the plate with tur physics, analysis and credible dpeartment of energy or some intellect from NASA to make a point. I’m beginning to believe you are all loosing your minds. Micro nukes as you call them are atomic bombs the size of near Hiroshima explosions and would wipe out damn near 1/3 of Manhatten of they were detonated! I mean comeon folks get with the real facts before you all look like a bunch of wacko’s waiting to contribute to Louis Farakhan’s flying sacucer religion. HHHHEEEEELLLLLOOOOOO! You all really dissapointing me with these crazy acusations and half assed science. Plese stop the throwing accusations and get with a credible source or series of sources, and knock off the crazy opinions. I mean the idea that nukes were smoldering under the WTC makes we want to go to a spirit channeler to ask the dead highjackers if they will tell me the truth form the other side. Beam me up scotty!
So, what are you saying? This is an inside job? The government is responsible for the whole 9/11 nightmare and that the 19 hijackers were just fabricated coverup????? Or did the terrorists have foot soldiers who placed the nukes inside the building?
Great reading but need more details, please
The plausibility and common sense proof of one or more low yield nukes to have been utilized during the destruction of the WTC complex is astronomical to say the least. The heat from the fires in the buildings was not likely hot enough to cause the damage witnessed so far away from the towers and the fires burning for weeks after the event are extremely good indicators that there were Nuclear bombs in and/or around the WTC Towers.
For those cars to be incinerated like they were is a tell tale sign that other than normal methods were used in this explosion!
They used a micro nuke to blow up the WTC complex, that explains why the amount of debris in comparison to the whole tower didn’t account for completely.
In fact even long deceased Phil Schneider a ex-government structural engineer and geologist talked about sub basement floors of WTC back in 1995 and that the only way to blow it up was by using a nuclear weapon. He was killed in January 1996, for openly talking about the Alien Threat and New World Order.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMht0qmibbU&feature=related @ begin watching at 01:15
I used to an idealist too.. I used to think that the government, MY government ALWAYS did th right thing – NEVER did evil – and was justified in any and all actions. Then one day I was caught in a speed trap and chose to go to court. The officer LIED to the judge… I woke up. I was naive’ to say the least. So THAT being said, all those out there (and you know who you are-) who can’t believe that the government of the United States of America would conduct a false flag operation, and murder thousands of it’s own citizens.. YOU ARE NAIVE’!!
Use the freedom of information act and look up “Operation Northwoods” – (amazing similarities between that CIA false-flag against CUBA and 9-1-1)
JFK’s refusal to allow it may be what cost him his life – we may never know.. But this proves that those in charge have planned this type operation before, and certainly wouldn’t hesitate to do so again..
To me, building 7 is the key to proving something fishy went on September, 2001. That 47 story high rise fell at near free fall speed, and at one point EXCEEDED free fall speed – a fact proven and pointed out to NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology – a gvt agency) during a live press conference. They had no choice but to admit the obvious and say “oops… we made a mistake..”. The ironic part is that a high school physics teacher had to correct what are purported to be the brightest minds America has to offer…. Indeed.
So the NIST report on 9-1-1 was amended… Not that the general public would know, I mean have you heard this on the evening news? Of course not. That should be the headline on every network! Why is it not?
The bottom line is, if you take the time and research everything about the attack – like I did – you will have no other choice than to conclude that the official story is the conspiracy – NOT what you are reading here on the internet. I guess maybe that might explain why the government is now trying to terminate the internet as we know it, and institute a new, tightly controlled, internet 2. What’s the world coming to when a government can’t even throw a false flag operation without those freedom-loving subjects wanting to know what they are really up to?!?