FDA: Eating Fish With Radiation 2400% Above Federal Limits “Poses No Health Risks”
The Intel Hub
By Alexander Higgins – Contributing Writer
April 6th, 2011
The EPA says eating fish caught in Japan, with radiation levels 2400% above Federal limits, does not pose any health risks. First Rainwater at 18,100% above drinking water limits is labeled as testing at levels far below concern. Now radiation in fish 2400% above federal food radiation limits also poses no health risks?
What I would really like know at this point is what levels qualify as “levels of concern”?
I recently posted the Federal Radiation limits for food in water in my article about Japan nuclear radiation being found in California drinking water.
First, I have seen comments that point people to federal food standards for radiation. For the record, I have correctly referenced the drinking water standard. Here they are:
Agency Media Standard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Drinking water* 4 mrem/yr equivalent to 3 pCi/L (0.1 Bq/L) continuous exposure Air** 2.1X10-13 Ci/m3 Food and Drug Administration Food in commerce (derived intervention level)*** 170 Becquerels per kilogram (4,600 pCi/kg) NRC, DOE, OSHA, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP), and International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Annual occupational exposure limits† 50 mSv (5 rem) for whole body dose 500 mSv (50 rem) for thyroid dose Source: CDC: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/iodine/standards_regulations.html
To be clear, the radiation limit for radiation in food is 170 Becquerels per kilogram. Here is screen shot of the FDA limits for radiation published on the CDC website with the food radiation limits highlighted.
FDA Radiation Limits With Food Radiation Limits Highlighted From The CDC
The New York Times reported that radiation levels in fish being caught in Japan are up to 4,080 becquerels of radioactive iodine 131 per kilogram.
Japan Sets Radiation Standards For Fish
…
The small fish caught Friday — before the intentional dumping began — had 4,080 becquerels of iodine 131 per kilogram. The new standards allow up to 2,000 becquerels of iodine 131 per kilogram, the standard used for vegetables in Japan, but it was unclear how the government would enforce the new rules.
The fish also contained cesium 137, which decays much more slowly than iodine 131, at a level of 526 becquerels per kilogram.
“Clearly the fish are consuming highly radioactive food,” said Paul G. Falkowski, a professor of marine, earth and planetary sciences at Rutgers University. But Professor Falkowski emphasized that even those levels were not likely to present health hazards in Japan or elsewhere, since fishing is restricted in Japan and these levels of radiation are not likely to travel far.
Still, experts on radiation in seafood said it was nearly impossible to get a full sense of the scope of the environmental and health risks until the Japanese released information on radiation levels in more species of fish and seaweed and in a greater number of locations. Measurements in the seawater are often not a good indication of how much radiation may be entering the food chain, scientists say.
4,080 becquerels per kg is clearly 2400% higher than the federal food limits for radiation in food of 170 becquerels per kg.
FDA Says Japanese Fish With Radiation 2400% Higher Than Federal Food Limits Pose No Health Risks
The Feds say that fish with radiation levels 2400% federal food limits is safe to eat.
U.S. Seeks to Reassure on Contaminated Food
…
U.S. public-health officials sought Tuesday to reassure consumers about the safety of food in the U.S., including seafood, amid news that fish contaminated with unusually high levels of radioactive materials had been caught in waters 50 miles from the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan.
No contaminated fish have turned up in the U.S., or in U.S. waters, according to experts from the Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. They expressed confidence that even a single fish sufficiently contaminated to pose a risk to human health would be detected by the U.S. monitoring system.
They also dismissed concerns that eating fish contaminated at the levels seen so far in Japan would pose such a risk.
Thomas Frieden, head of the CDC in Atlanta, said he expected continued detection of low levels of radioactive elements in the water, air and food in the U.S. in coming days, but that readings at those levels “do not indicate any level of public health concern.”
Source:Wall Street Journal
Back in the real world…
Radiation Experts: Radiation Standards Are Up to 1,000 Higher Than Is Safe for the Human Body
The U.S. federal drinking water standard for radioactive Iodine-131 is 3 picocuries per liter, but levels exceeding that by many times have been detected in rainwater sampled in California, Idaho, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts …
NHK: Japan Nuclear Reactor Radiation Levels NOW So High They Can’t Be Measured!
NHK reports that radiation levels at the Fukushima nuclear reactor in Japan are now so high that they can’t be measured.
Follow @IntelHub







Some one who knows could explain when radiation amount is too much of a risk. But I don’t believe you would listen.
actually ive been listening. Dr. Chris Busby is very credible and has exposed the governments lies about radiation. You can listen to all the fake experts you want, im going to go with reality.
So let me get this straight – When radiation levels start to show up, you just raise the level of the federal limits? Oh I guess if the government and the lobbyists tell us radiation at those levels are safe, it must be true. These guys need to eat the fish and drink the water first.
The Physicians for Social Responsibility said NO amount of radiation is safe in food/water
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8678503-japan-is-dumping-11500-tons-of-radioactive-water-into-pacific-ocean
Now the radiation is expected to concentrate in the upper food chain
http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8704326-japan-injects-nitrogen-into-reactor-to-reduce-risk-of-explosion
Some are suggesting this is a false flag attack on the us bread basket. The only source I have found is leuren moret so far, but it is an interesting theory. She is also well credentialed including an expert on haarp. todays recent development is another earth quake in japan and tsunami threat. Has the war really began.
03/15/2010
Leuren Moret Biography: Independent Scientist; Expert Witness at the Tokyo International Tribunal for War Crimes in Afghanistan; Expert Witness on HAARP & Environmental Warfare
Leuren Moret was an Expert Witness at the International Criminal Tribunal For Afghanistan At Tokyo. She is an independent scientist and international expert on radiation and public health issues.