buy silver

Dangerous Levels Of Radiation Recorded In Canada As Fukushima Radiation Dangers Continue

The Intel Hub
By Alex Thomas
July 19, 2011

Multiple videos have been released showing high levels of radiation in Canada as the corporate media continues to cover up the real dangers posed by the  Fukushima nuclear disaster.

The tests were taken in multiple places in Canada including Lake Louise BC, Kelowna BC, Red Deer/Edmonton, and Hope BC.

The radiation tests that were taken near Lake Louise Alberta clearly showed harmful radiation levels up to 1.66 mcSv/hr .

So far Canadian and American authorities have remained silent. We must DEMAND action from local health authorities. If these levels of radiation are being picked up in Canada it seems only a matter of time before they reach the west coast of the United States.

This should be a RED ALERT to all Americans and Canadians!

Kelowna BC receives High Fukushima Fallout Radioactive Rain on 07/16/11

CRMT- Hope BC receives High Radioactive Fukushima Fallout Rain on 07/16/11

HIGH Radiations levels found in Rain samples from Red Deer/Edmonton (1.02 mcSv/hr)

LATEST WATER NEWS: Radiation Detected In Drinking Water In 13 U.S. Cities — Get your ANTIRAD-Plus — Radioisotope (Radiation), Heavy Metal and Chemical Reduction + Alkalizer WATER FILTER TODAY!(Ad)



Print Friendly

Comments

28 Responses to “Dangerous Levels Of Radiation Recorded In Canada As Fukushima Radiation Dangers Continue”
  1. Barbara Smith says:

    I have been on a project in Los Angeles since Feb 2011. I have a portable radiation dector that I carry. Yes, it indicates there is radiation in California. There are websites that show how the cloud weather pattern blows from Japan to the west coast. Also, I think it is CAL tech that is monitoring and yes there is already radioactivity found in California but they say it is all within acceptable levels. Funny how they don’t monitor every day. I wonder what the levels are on the days they don’t monitor. Anyway, you can see the results on their website and see the cloud pattern for yourself. I know an environmental scientist who sent me this information to the websites and he does this for a living so I respect his information.

  2. hmm says:

    What do they mean ‘before it reaches the west coast of the US?’ Isn’t that what hundreds of articles since the March disaster have already been warning? That it has already been found on the west coast and continues?

  3. Ray Hudson says:

    Keep the record straight: Lake Louise is not in BC it’s in Alberta. Thx

  4. Steve Moyer says:

    I made a MetaLink for this page so it can be posted on Facebook, which censors the Intel Hub.

    http://canadaradiation.nodes.org

  5. Kaitlin says:

    wOW This site is for REALLY stupid people isn’t it?

    • Kaitlin's a Troll says:

      Is that why you are here? So far your comment is the dumbest thing on this whole entire site…..

      • frank b says:

        Kaitlin it’s obvious you are a complete brain dead idiot and moron that is as smart as a flie on a dogs ass. You write do eralizr we get radiation from the sun ,how stupid are of course we do but fukushima radiation from far from what the sun gives us you stupid idiot .Kaitlin do you know what hot particles are idiot. I’ll tell you they are deadly, plutonium and uranium hot particles which thousands of milions of them were released from that plant into the atomsphere. There life span of emiting high radiation is around 24000 yrs. Also stronium 90, iodine 131 and cesium 137 are polluting the ground and water. Kaitlin if i had my way i’d ship you to fukushima plant and make you work right at the reactors until you dropped dead.

  6. Kaitlin says:

    YOu morons do realize that we get radiation from the sun on a daily basis, right?

    • Kaitlin's a Troll says:

      I am sure that the majority of people on this website understand that radiation comes from the sun (I believe that person in the movie showed the background radiation levels first before testing the rain radiation level). I also think that people on this site understand that since a few reactors melted down there may be higher levels of radiation in the environment.

      Kaitlin check out http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ there are a ton of like minded people like you there. I’m sure they have all the latest news on much more important topics than this silly site…..

      • MC USA says:

        I was on MSNBC site the other day and they were reporting Iran shot down a US drone over its nuclear site. Of course there wereno pictures, only quotes from unnamed sources within the Iranian news agencies – but the ignorant, hate-filled comments from those bloated, misguided morons beneath the article was and is hysterical – like a hangout for trolls and shills dedicated to parroting any sort of flimsy lie the USG MSM inc. wants to put out to futher its agenda

    • frank b says:

      Kaitlin please stand out in the rain everyday and drink the rain water plzz and then a year later get pregnant and see what kind of baby you have

    • joe says:

      You didn’t seriously just say that did you?

  7. Andii says:

    The difference of danger between Sun ray and these radiation from nuclear plant is that you are going to be poisoned with particles which you will ingest through food and drink. Internal radiation poisoning is much dangerous than external radiation burns because even a low level can affect your health in many ways.

    Chernobyl’s nuclear exclusion zone is decided by UN’s definition which measures at 1.5μSv/h and the measurement in Canada was 1.66μSv/h. It’s simple enough for you to work out the danger.

    Fukushima continues to spew radiation amount of 1 Billion Bq/Hour that’s because they can’t contain it. US & Canada don’t report the contamination in their country because the news is inconvenient.

  8. Any information about Vancouver?

  9. eph7 says:

    http://www.doh.wa.gov/Topics/japan/monitor.htm
    The DOH of Washington state stopped monitoring daily in May, 2011. Some reports have come from KING 5 about “some” radiation in the rain.

    Is there anyone monitoring radiation in Washington State with the same type of dectectors and publishing their information on the web?

    Also, what make/model are those radiation detectors?

    Thanks in advance.

  10. cke says:

    1.66mcSV/h reading is recorded in the condition under rain?
    fall out become high in the rain.
    high reading the fall out in the rain is normal, I guess.

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] a Comment //    The Intel HubBy Alex ThomasJuly 19, 2011Multiple videos have been released showing high levels of radiation in [...]

  2. [...] Dangerous Levels Of Radiation Recorded In Canada As Fukushima Radiation Dangers Continue :. July 19th, 2011 | Category: Uncategorized | Leave a comment | [...]

  3. [...] Dangerous Levels Of Radiation Recorded In Canada As Fukushima Radiation Dangers Continue [...]

  4. [...] National LabDebt Ceiling Psy Op: Broken Promises Broken DreamsDeath Loving Media Attacks ChildrenDangerous Levels Of Radiation Recorded In Canada As Fukushima Radiation Dangers ContinueWas TWA 800 Shot Down By a Military Missile?ABSURD! Obama Says 80% Of Americans Want Tax Increase! [...]

  5. [...] http://theintelhub.com/2011/07/19/dangerous-levels-of-radiation-recorded-in-canada-as-fukushima-radi... This entry was posted on Thursday, July 21st, 2011 at 1:05 am and is filed under Asian News, Nuclear Power Plant Alerts, US News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]



Thank you for your continued support!

Join Our Exclusive Mailing List
Email:
For Email Marketing you can trust

 

Print Friendly